Major changes at WHO
As WHO reported itself, on Wednesday, “WHO announced the most wide-ranging reforms in the Organization’s history to modernize and strengthen the institution to play its role more effectively and efficiently as the world’s leading authority on public health. The changes are designed to support countries in achieving the ambitious “triple billion” targets that are at the heart of WHO’s strategic plan for the next five years: one billion more people benefitting from universal health coverage (UHC); one billion more people better protected from health emergencies; and one billion more people enjoying better health and well-being.”
Bruce Aylward (advisor of Tedros) & the transformation team have been quite important in this process.
As this is a knowledge management newsletter, we won’t try to reinvent the wheel here. We’ll just flag here the must-reads among the news reports, coverage & analyses on this major transformation of WHO, formally announced by dr. Tedros & regional directors (jointly) on Wednesday to showcase ‘WHO’s Oneness’.
WHO (press release) – WHO unveils sweeping reforms in drive towards “triple billion” targets
Good overview of the reforms, from WHO itself. Start by reading this.
Coverage & analyses
Devex – New WHO structure revealed (by J L Ravelo – absolute must-read – includes the new WHO headquarters structure) “WHO has just revamped its senior management. It is also added new divisions and departments and with these, a slew of new positions.” (PS: among others, there are SDH & Health Promotion Departments now 😊)
HPW – WHO Announces “Most Wide-Ranging Reforms In Organization’s History” (excellent coverage & analysis – must-read)
NYT – W.H.O. Chief Plans to Reorganize a Vast Bureaucracy (recommended coverage, with focus on push to increase staff mobility of WHO)
“A fundamental problem — tension between regional offices and the headquarters in Geneva — cannot be fixed by fiat. Still, staffers are set to move around the globe.” The World Health Organization on Wednesday announced a long-awaited restructuring intended to streamline the agency — and strongly hinted that it intended to shake up some staffers’ resistance to change….”
“One change that was only briefly touched on in the speech could be truly disruptive to a staid agency that employs 7,000 people. It was a new “mobility program” that will be “a key criterion for career progression.” … Some experts have long advocated that the W.H.O. imitate the United Nations Fund for Children or UNICEF, which frequently rotates its staff around the world, making them more familiar with local problems and disrupting power bases….”
- The die-hards among you might want to reach Tedros (& regional directors’) joint speech in full. And the new WHO headquarters leadership team.
Global Health 50/50 report: Equality Works
See this week’s intro. You find the press-release here.
“Ground-breaking analysis of 198 global organisations active in health… … reveals that the majority are failing to deliver on sexual harassment policies, gender pay gap reporting, and gender parity in leadership positions. Launched in Ethiopia by the country’s first female president, H.E. Sahle-Work Zewde, the second Global Health 50/50 Report, Equality Works, shows that few of the world’s top global organisations active in health are achieving gender equality for their employees. This is despite more than a year’s worth of news headlines detailing widespread gender-based discrimination in workplaces around the world. The report exposes pay gaps; lack of policies on parental leave, sexual harassment and flexible working; and a systematic absence of women in leadership roles. “Coming to light in the #MeToo era, the findings of this groundbreaking report prove that the fight for gender-equality is far from won. Global health organisations are failing to walk the talk.” said Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand. “…”
Still, there’s been some progress (though not nearly enough). The report zooms in more organisations than last year, and also added a few areas/dimensions compared to last year.
Check out the key findings, and make sure you go through the whole report!
As a reminder, “Global Health 50/50 is an independent initiative created to advance accountability and action for gender equality in global health housed by the University College London Centre for Gender and Global Health. The 198 organisations in the study include United Nations bodies, bilateral and multilateral development institutions, philanthropic organisations, non-governmental organisations, faith-based organisations, public-private partnerships, the private sector, and academic journals and their parent companies.”
Apparently, in a next edition also academic institutes will be included.
Excellent coverage in HPW – Global Health Agencies Face Yawning Gaps In Gender Equality – New 50/50 Report (with key messages, and also the take from Sarah Hawkes & Kent Buse on a number of the findings).
Great coverage also on Devex (J L Ravelo) (specifically focusing on sexual harassment policies in global health organisations) – In the era of #AidToo, global health is short on sexual harassment policies.
International Women’s Day
Some reads related to IWD, some of them published ahead of the Day.
Guardian – Only six countries in the world give women and men equal legal work rights
“If you’re a woman and want to be on an equal footing with men, it’s best to live and work in Belgium, Denmark, France, Latvia, Luxembourg or Sweden. The World Bank, which has tracked legal changes for the past decade, found these were the only countries in the world to enshrine gender equality in laws affecting work. The bank’s women, business and the law 2019 report, published this week, measured gender discrimination in 187 countries. It found that, a decade ago, no country gave women and men equal legal rights.”
I should probably refrain from saying ‘Belgium, 12 points!’ 😊.
Speaking of Medicine (blog) – Overcoming inaction and increasing access to safe abortion care: MSF experience
“On International Womens Day, Claire Fotheringham, Manisha Kumar, and Catrin Schulte-Hillen of Médecins Sans Frontières discuss recent efforts to improve access to safe abortion care worldwide.”
UN News – Break taboo around menstruation, act to end ‘disempowering’ discrimination, say UN experts
“A group of seven United Nations rights experts issued a clarion call on Tuesday to break the taboo around menstrual health for women and girls that persists in many parts of the world and take concrete action to end “disempowering” discrimination.”
“Persistent harmful socio-cultural norms, stigma, misconceptions and taboos around menstruation, continue to lead to exclusion and discrimination of women and girls”, said the independent human rights experts, ahead of International Women’s Day on 8 March. Despite recent campaigns by women to challenge menstruation taboos and increasing attention to the issue of menstruation in the media, research, policy-making, and cultural discussion, they underscored the need for “more efforts to address challenges faced by women and girls”….
- The Conversation – #MeToo isn’t big in Africa. But women have launched their own versions
“ … is Africa part of this global movement against sexual violence? In her assessment of transnational activism in Africa, author Titilope Adayi, indicates that the global dimension of #MeToo has centred on the involvement of certain countries such as the US, the UK, France, India and China. There’s been virtually no mention of Africa or the Middle East. But the visibility of #MeToo makes it easy to overlook the very powerful campaigns against sexual violence that go on in Africa. Most are happening outside the digital space….”
- The Conversation – How alcohol companies are using International Women’s Day to sell more drinks to women.
- UN News – Women still struggle to find a job, let alone reach the top: new UN report calls for ‘quantum leap’ “ Women’s job opportunities have barely improved since the early 1990s, UN labour experts said on Thursday, warning that female workers are still penalized for having children and looking after them. Released on the eve of International Women’s Day, celebrated on 8 March, the International Labour Organization (ILO) report found that 3 billion women were in work in 2018, compared with two billion men – a less than two per cent improvement in the last 27 years….”
- UN News – Women’s empowerment ‘essential to global progress’ says Guterres, marking International Day.
- FP – Celebrating #MeToo’s Global Impact “In countries around the world, progress defies the backlash.”
End Period Poverty
Thomson Reuters Foundation – UK launches global fund to help end ‘period poverty’ by 2050
“Britain launched a global “period poverty” fund and taskforce on Monday to help all women and girls access sanitary products by 2050 and to tackle the stigma around menstruation. … … The government pledged to give 2 million pounds to organizations working to end period poverty globally, and has also earmarked 250,000 pounds to create a taskforce of government departments, charities and private enterprises to tackle the issue….”
AHAIC conference in Kigali (5-7 March)
“The Africa Health Agenda International Conference 2019 [took] place this week in Kigali, Rwanda, from 5th to 7th March. It [served] as a platform to foster new ideas and home-grown solutions to the continent’s most pressing health challenges, with a focus on achieving universal health coverage (UHC) in Africa by 2030.”
Some reads & news bits:
Published ahead of the conference: “Dr. Githinji Gitahi, Group CEO of Amref Health Africa, talks about Africa’s unique path to UHC and what to expect at #AHAIC2019.”
“ From March 5 to 7 in Kigali, Rwanda, Amref Health Africa and the Rwandan Ministry of Health are convening for the Africa Health Agenda International Conference (Africa Health 2019 – #AHAIC2019 Africa Health 2019) – a platform to foster “new ideas and home-grown solutions” to the most pressing health challenges in Africa, with a focus on achieving UHC in Africa by 2030.
“Africa Health 2019 is viewed as a key opportunity to map a pathway from commitment to action and to build momentum for UHC among policymakers, civil society, technical experts, innovators, thought leaders, academics and youth leaders. The event is a milestone in the run-up to the UN high-level meeting on UHC in September, where the global commitment to UHC will be galvanized through a political declaration agreed upon by UN member states….”
Well worth a read.
Excerpt: “…This is why I have been advocating for a seventh building block of health systems in addition to the current six building blocks used by WHO to describe health systems – one that incorporates communities and citizen needs. Therefore, UN member states should put communities at the forefront of the political declaration in September….”
“Rwanda’s Minister of Health, Dr Diane Gashumba, has called on Africa’s heads of governments to collaborate towards healthcare financing.”
“Speaking at the opening ceremony of the confab, co-hosted by Amref Health Africa and Rwanda’s Ministry of Health, she said, “Investing in Universal Health Coverage (UHC) is one of the smartest investments a country can make.” She added: “In the past two decades, African countries have displayed commendable leadership in furthering the UHC agenda across the continent….”
called UHC one of the smartest investments a country can make, praised African leadership on UHC in the last 2 decades, and urged heads of state to keep up the momentum.
- Jean Kagubare (deputy director Global Primary Health Care systems, at the Gates Foundation): Africa: Three Promising Pathways to Universal Health Coverage in Africa
“…We are now at a critical moment in Africa’s health care journey. From Botswana to Kenya to South Africa, countries across the continent are considering or enacting unprecedented health reforms. The coming months and years are a crucial window to see if countries can make good on their promises, beginning at tomorrow’s Africa Health Agenda International Conference in Kigali. … … The conversations in Kigali [will be] key to uniting the African community ahead of the first-ever United Nations High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage in September, when Heads of State from around the world will gather in New York to chart a course toward achieving universal health coverage.”…”
“While every country’s path to universal health coverage will look different, I am excited about three key approaches: using data to guide improvements, leveraging new technologies to expand access to care, and making better decisions about where to spend resources….”
“On Tuesday, as the second biennial Africa Health Agenda International Conference kicked off in the rainy hills of Kigali, Rwanda, some 1,500 health advocates representing more than 40 countries learned from the successes and setbacks posed by universal health coverage, or UHC, programs in countries such as Rwanda and Kenya. … … Providing an affordable option for Africa’s poorest will be a determining factor whether countries will achieve Sustainable Development Goal 3, which is to “ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all” by 2030, explained Githinji Gitahi, CEO at Africa’s largest health development organization, AMREF Health Africa. “Financial protections for the vulnerable is embedded into what universal health coverage means by definition, which is a concept that overall looks at how to provide quality health services to people without them struggling to afford it, he told journalists at a press conference. Eleven million Africans are pushed into poverty every year due to medical expenses, according to the World Health Organization. … …
“At the conference, African ministers of health, WHO officials, NGOs, innovators, youth, and civil society representatives emphasized that achieving UHC would not only require increased access for marginalized populations and heightened financial support from both governments and public-private partnerships. It would also require improved health service quality and ways to hold governments and health providers accountable to citizens.
Experts called on government leaders to take local action on prior commitments made, including the 2016 Tokyo International Conference on African Development signing of the Universal Health Coverage in Africa Framework for Action and the 2001 Abuja Declaration adoption where governments pledged to allocate 15 percent of national budgets to improving…”
Some other news we want to flag from AHAIC:
- Tweet: “We’ve officially launched the @WHO guidelines to assist national governments, as well as national & international partners to improve the design, implementation, performance & evaluation of #CHW programmes in Africa. “ For the Guidelines, see here.
- March 7: the Closing Ceremony was the official launch of the Women in Global Health African Regional Hub #WGHAfrica https://ahaic.org/session/plenary-vii/
- Official launch of SPARC (Strategic Purchasing Africa Resource center).
“The Strategic Purchasing Africa Resource Center (SPARC) is a new resource hub aimed at strengthening strategic purchasing capacity in Sub-Saharan Africa by connecting existing regional expertise and matching it with country demand to make better use of resources.”
Migration & health
Lancet Global Health – Effects of non-health-targeted policies on migrant health: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Cfr a Lancet (GH) Press release:
“The Lancet Global Health: Restrictive migration policies contribute to poor migrant health in high-income countries. Too often non-health-related policies leave migrants facing worse health situations, and governments must honour their humanitarian obligations to provide health for all
Restrictive entry and integration policies are having an adverse effect on the health of migrants in high-income countries, according to the most comprehensive assessment of the impact of general migration policies on migrant health, published in The Lancet Global Health journal.
The systematic review and meta-analysis, synthesising all the available evidence from the scientific literature, finds that international migrants facing restrictive policies such as temporary visa status, detention, and reduced access to welfare are less likely to use general health services (hindering individual and public health), and are at greater risk of poor mental health and dying prematurely from any cause compared with native populations. The authors say that efforts to improve the health of migrants would benefit from adopting a ‘Health in All Policies’ perspective, which considers the health effects of all migrant-orientated policies, and embracing a human-rights framework that emphasises the rights of migrants under international law. …”
Check out also the related Lancet Global Health Comment Adverse health effects of restrictive migration policies: building the evidence base to change practice.
Thankfully, earlier this week, the EU (Commission) declared the migration crisis officially ‘over’. (Guardian) #ahum
“The European commission has declared the migration crisis over, as it sharpened its attack on “fake news” and “misinformation” about the issue. Frans Timmermans, the European commission’s first vice-president, said: “Europe is no longer experiencing the migration crisis we lived in 2015, but structural problems remain.”…”
You really don’t want to know how the EU got to this migration ‘deliverable’, at our borders & deep in Africa ☹.
Hopes rise for Aids cure after bone-marrow transplant rids man of HIV
“A cure for Aids is a step closer, scientists believe, after a bone marrow transplant that has left a London patient HIV-free for 18 months. The success in London, 12 years after Timothy Brown, the so-called Berlin patient, underwent a similar transplant, was hailed as a key moment in the long hunt for a cure. “Although it is not a viable large-scale strategy for a cure, it does represent a critical moment in the search for an HIV cure,” said Anton Pozniak, the president of the International Aids Society. “These new findings reaffirm our belief that there exists a proof of concept that HIV is curable. The hope is that this will eventually lead to a safe, cost-effective and easy strategy to achieve these results using gene technology or antibody techniques.”…”
See also the Guardian – London patient becomes second man to be cleared of Aids virus.
As always, wait & see, I guess…
World Hearing Day (March 3)
UN News – ‘Once lost, hearing doesn’t come back’: World Health Organization warns on World Hearing Day
“Many people live with unidentified hearing loss, often failing to realize that they are missing out on certain sounds and words. To address this problem, the World Health Organization (WHO) is urging people on this year’s World Hearing Day, held on March 3, to check their hearing. Worldwide, some 466 million people have disabling hearing loss, and the WHO estimates that by 2050 that figure will almost double, affecting one in 10 people. The cost of unaddressed hearing loss is believed to be around US$ 750 billion. …”
“To mark World Hearing Day 2019, WHO has launched a new mobile and web-based app called “hearWHO,” which allows people to check their hearing regularly, and intervene early in case of hearing loss. It can also be used by health workers to screen people in the community, and refer them for diagnostic testing if they fail the screening….”
Guardian – Youth climate strikers: ‘We are going to change the fate of humanity’
“Students issue an open letter ahead of global day of action on 15 March, when young people are expected to strike across 50 nations.”
UN News – Time to see air pollution as a human rights threat: U.N.
“Air pollution has long been an environmental and health problem – but now it should now be viewed as a human rights issue as well, according to the U.N. special rapporteur on human rights and the environment. Air pollution is leading to 7 million premature deaths a year around the world, including 600,000 among children, David Boyd said. “To put that 7 million figure in context, that’s more deaths every year than the combined total of war, murder, tuberculosis, HIV, AIDs and malaria,” the U.N. expert told the Thomson Reuters Foundation in an interview. “It’s a global health crisis that really needs to be addressed. Air pollution violates the rights to life, to health, the rights of the child, and also violates the right to live in a healthy and sustainable environment,” he said. But clear solutions to the problem exist, he said in a report to the Human Rights Council in Geneva Monday, laying out a range of steps governments can take to cut air pollution….”
“Shifting to renewable energy could save up to 150 million lives by the end of the century amid concerns that six billion people regularly inhale air “so polluted that it puts their life, health and well-being at risk”, a UN-appointed independent rights expert said on Monday.”
A few analyses by De-growth experts on the New Green Deal
They aren’t fully convinced, as the New Green Deal has too much of ‘Green Growth’ in it.
Jason Hickel, in the Guardian – Climate breakdown is coming. The UK needs a Greener New Deal
- Finally, a quick link:
Lancet Letter – Legislate for carbon net zero by 2030.
“On Nov 29, 2018, the UK Health Alliance on Climate Change, of which the Climate and Health Council, BMJ, and The Lancet are members, sent a letter to the UK Prime Minister saying that for the preservation of both planetary and human health, the UK must become carbon net zero before 2050. Given the recent warning from Sir David Attenborough of the risk of civilisational breakdown, and the increasingly forceful statements from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), it is clear that the climate crisis has reached a new level of severity. To forestall the planetary catastrophe that Attenborough and the IPCC predict, the UK must take the lead, set an international example, and become carbon net zero by 2030. We therefore call on the UK Government and parliament to legislate for the UK to be carbon net zero by 2030, and to work with institutions across the country to ensure that this goal is achieved.”
Boston Review Forum – Forum of ‘Economics for Inclusive Prosperity’
This will be a Forum now, dedicated to ‘Economics for Inclusive Prosperity’, with regular contributions.
Among others, we quite enjoyed Alice Evans’ Economics after neoliberalism: we need stronger trade unions and corporate accountability.
CEPI Board meeting (7-8 March, Tokyo)
Stay tuned for the Board meeting summary here.
As a reminder, via CEPI’s website: “…CEPI was founded in Davos by the governments of Norway and India, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, and the World Economic Forum. … CEPI has secured $750 million toward its $1billion funding target, with multi-year funding from Norway, Germany, Japan, Canada, Australia, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Wellcome. CEPI has also received single-year investments from the governments of Belgium and the UK. The European Commission foresees substantial financial contributions to support relevant projects through its mechanisms….”
This was the main controversy ahead of the Board meeting:
Cidrap News – MSF questions affordable access to CEPI-supported vaccines
“Doctors Without Borders (MSF) yesterday sent an open letter to the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovations (CEPI) expressing concerns about recent revisions to its equitable access policy that it says weakens guarantees that countries can buy vaccines developed with CEPI support at an affordable price. In a statement today, CEPI said its commitment to access hasn’t changed, but the earlier draft of the policy was overly prescriptive and has been a barrier to potential partners….”
“MSF sent the letter to CEPI ahead of its board meeting in Tokyo, slated for Mar 7 and 8, and the letter was signed by Joanne Liu, MD, MSF’s international president, and Els Torreele, PhD, executive director of the MSF Access Campaign. The group has been instrumental in pushing for affordable access to vaccines, waging a 7-year campaign that led to lower-priced pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) for developing countries that incorporate it into their childhood vaccination campaigns. CEPI was founded in 2017 in the wake of West Africa’s Ebola outbreak as a novel way to fund and speed the development of new vaccine candidates against emerging infectious diseases, especially three priority ones: Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), Nipah virus, and Lassa virus. It is supported by the governments of Norway, Germany, India, Japan, Belgium, Canada, and Australia, plus groups including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, World Economic Forum, Medical Research Future Fund, and European Commission. So far, CEPI has funded 21 vaccines, and its investments have totaled $350 million over the past year….”
Scientific Publishing – A tipping point?
Nature News – Huge US university cancels subscription with Elsevier
News from late last news. “University of California and Dutch publisher fail to strike deal that would allow researchers to publish under open-access terms.” Could be a game-changer/tipping point.
In other news on scientific publishing, related to innovation in peer review, see Tracker is a boon for innovation in peer review (Nature) “Nature welcomes a registry that supports experiments to improve refereeing.”
And for the latest, see also Science – A report about Plan S’s potential effects on journals marks a busy week for the open-access movement
“ …Many journals aren’t prepared to meet the requirements of Plan S, the proposal largely by European funders to require grantees to publish articles that are immediately open access, a report from a science publishing analytics company says….”
Vaccines, anti-vaccine movement & social media platforms
Foreign Policy – The World’s Many Measles Conspiracies Are All the Same
Must-read. Cfr some tweets:
“It’s not just measles. It’s bigger and more problematic. The ever-wise @Laurie_Garrett with a very sharp overview of the rise of anti-vax sentiment in the US and around the world.”
“”Vaccination isn’t just an individual choice; it’s a social contract entered into by the public and its government.””
Guardian – Shock rise in global measles outbreaks ‘disastrous’ for children, UN warns
News from late last week. “Cases of childhood measles are surging to shocking levels around the globe, led by 10 countries that account for three-quarters of the rise. Amid warnings of “disastrous consequences” for children if the disease continues to spread unchecked, a worldwide survey by the UN children’s agency, Unicef, said 98 countries around the globe reported a rise in measles cases in 2018 compared with 2017….”
Vox – Pinterest, Facebook, and YouTube are cracking down on fake vaccine news
“But it’s not clear how much influence social media has over parents refusing vaccines for their kids.”
“ “The conversation around vaccines emphasizes social media more than the evidence can support,” said Brendan Nyhan, a professor of public policy at the University of Michigan who studies vaccine misinformation. “Would parents come up with some other reason not to vaccinate their kids [without misinformation on social media]? We don’t know.”…” (see also Laurie Garrett’s analysis in Foreign Policy).
See also FT – Facebook aims to crack down on vaccine misinformation.
A few more links related to Amazon & vaccines:
Guardian – No link between autism and MMR, affirms major study
You probably got this via the media already.
“The measles, mumps and rubella vaccine does not cause autism, according to a major study carried out in an attempt to reassure growing numbers of vaccination-doubters, as measles outbreaks surge. Doubts about MMR were sown by the gastroenterologist Andrew Wakefield, who hypothesised in 1998 that it was linked to autism….”
Check out the new study, by Danish researchers, in The Annals of Internal Medicine.
Not sure the anti-vaxx movement will listen much, though.
Lancet Editorial – Canada’s mandatory vaccination reporting plans
“An outbreak of measles in Vancouver, BC, Canada, has prompted new considerations about mandatory vaccination and reporting as tools to manage outbreaks and increase vaccination coverage… … But mandatory reporting is not a panacea, says Althea Hayden, medical health officer in Vancouver. … The longstanding practice in Canada and the USA of linking vaccine uptake strategies to schooling should be reconsidered. Many contemporary outbreaks are started by unvaccinated travellers. Authorities might need to consider requiring vaccination for passports, as Argentina has announced, and for entry requirements, as with yellow-fever vaccination.”
Lancet – India and Pakistan: a plea for sanity
Z A Bhutta, R Horton et al ; https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(19)30534-3/fulltext
“Once again, India and Pakistan stood at the brink of war over Kashmir, and have only just begun to tone down the posturing and threats. With nuclear weapons uncomfortably close at hand, almost 2 billion people in the region face the risk of nuclear catastrophe. For well over three decades now, multiple simulations and projections have suggested that an India–Pakistan nuclear escalation could lead to millions of deaths in the region, rivalling past great famines. The consequences of a nuclear exchange of any magnitude could affect generations to come. Kashmir has proved an especially intractable political predicament for the two countries. As Arundhati Roy wrote in her 2017 novel, The Ministry of Utmost Happiness, the confrontation over Kashmir is “a perfect war—a war that can never be won or lost, a war without end”….”
“”The threat of war is a matter of urgent public health concern. Health workers have a duty to speak out and plead for peace.”
Lancet: Offline: Has global health lost it?
Confession: I’m not a big fan of Kishore Mahbubani’s discourse. But I do share most of Horton’s analysis of implications for global health, after he read Mahbubani’s book, ‘Has the West lost it?’
“…What does Mahbubani’s analysis mean for global health? First, western global health elites must reappraise their history. They must reflect on, understand, and come to terms with their colonial legacies, the consequences of their wars, and the adverse effects of their political and economic dominance. Second, based on that historical reappraisal, western approaches to global health must be radically rethought. We should be preparing for a near future in which centres of economic, political, and people power will shift from the West to the Rest. Third, strong and effective multilateral institutions will become increasingly important for managing this new world. The West should be investing in multilateral health institutions, ensuring that their leadership and governance is truly international (which currently it is not). Fourth, the hegemony of the white Anglo-American male in global health must come to an end. Finally, global health initiatives, processes, and events must prioritise voices outside the traditionally dominant western elites. It is painful to be confronted with the truth about yourself. It is painful to give up power and privilege. But for all those working in global health, it’s time we listened to Mahbubani. Because global health has indeed truly lost it.”
We should listen to some of Mahbubani’s ideas, but not to all, I’d say.
The G20 Health & Development Partnership – Report: Healthy Nations, Sustainable Economies
Cfr coverage of this new report in the Telegraph: New funding models for health urgently needed, experts warn
“Finance ministers must use their “political firepower” to help tackle some of the most pressing health challenges such as obesity and tuberculosis. According to a report from the G20 Health and Development Partnership – a global coalition of charities, businesses and academics – the world is failing to invest in the fight against ill health, with countries at risk of being left behind. And unless finance ministers “take ownership” of efforts to develop new financing models, both the human and economic repercussions will be huge, the report warns….” “Between now and 2030, deaths from noncommunicable diseases will double in G20 countries, while infectious diseases like tuberculosis are becoming drug resistant,” said Alan Donnelly, convener of the G20 Health and Development Partnership. “We need more concerted activity for research and development to tackle this existential crisis. This is no longer just an issue for health ministers, it is now an issue for heads of government and for finance ministers because of the threat to the global economy as well as to humanity. It calls for innovative solutions to funding health, arguing that ill health could cost the world billions in treatment and lost productivity, with estimates suggesting that the global cost of a moderately severe or severe pandemic would be US $570 billion, or 0.7 per cent of global income.
… The report recommends new models to overcome the so-called “10-90” gap, where less than 10 per cent of world health resources benefit developing countries, which experience more than 90 per cent of infectious diseases….”
“The partnership is presenting the report to the heads of government finance and health ministers in advance of the joint G20 health and finance ministers meeting in Japan in June. “
See also the FT – Diseases pose global economic growth threat, G20 warned
Corruption & health systems
WHO/ UK Aid – Integrating a focus on anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in health systems assessments
One of the must-reads of the week. “Corruption in the health sector has high costs both in terms of lives lost and financial resources wasted. Recognizing the importance of this issue, WHO Member States and development partners are working to prevent and control corruption. As part of this efforts, it is critical to advance a more coherent approach towards mainstreaming anti-corruption efforts into work to strengthen and repurpose health systems towards universal health coverage. The goal of this work is to support the efforts of WHO Member States to prevent corruption through greater transparency and reinforced accountability mechanisms in their health systems. To concretely support these efforts, this document proposes new ways to approach health systems assessment to help diagnose corruption risk areas and help countries to decide which ant-corruption, transparency and accountability approaches should be deployed in response.”
The Background of this report: “In the 2018–2019 biennium, the World Health Organization (WHO) is advancing work on strengthening anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in health systems. This workstream is a partnership of the Health Systems Governance and Financing and the Gender, Equity and Human Rights teams of WHO headquarters, supported by other collaborating partners with expertise and interest in promoting transparency and accountability mechanisms in health systems. One activity within this workstream focuses on improving and integrating further guidance on good governance, accountability, transparency and anti-corruption in assessment frameworks, measures and policy guidance used in health systems strengthening towards universal health coverage….”
In other corruption & global health related news, check out Premium Times – Global Fund for Health: How seven African countries squandered millions of foreign aid
World Bank leadership update
Devex – Lebanon withdraws World Bank nominee under pressure
“Lebanon has withdrawn its nomination of Ziad Hayek to be the next World Bank president. Hayek told Devex on Monday the Lebanese government made its decision because of “pressure” from other governments. “I received some bad news today that the Lebanese government has withdrawn my nomination, but I’m continuing to fight on, still hoping that another party might nominate me instead,” Hayek told Devex. “There was pressure on the Lebanese government from other governments to withdraw my nomination,” he said….”
Not good. But see also Reuters for a bit more info on this story (and perhaps another perspective). “An official with Lebanon’s finance ministry confirmed that the nomination had been withdrawn before it was registered by the World Bank’s nominating committee, adding: “there was no American pressure or other (pressure).” The same official said some parts of the Lebanese government – which includes nearly all of Lebanon’s rival political factions – wanted to nominate Hayek, but others did not. In the end, the finance ministry decided not to proceed with a candidate viewed as having little chance of winning, the official said….”
Meanwhile, in a Washington Post Op-ed, some high-level insiders/observers (John Podesta among others) said WB directors should reject David Malpass, Trump’s pick for WB chief, (as he’s unqualified according to their own criteria). And ‘empower developing nations to shape the future’.
CGD note – A Short-Sighted Vision for Global Britain
By Owen Barder et al.
“There has been a resurgence in calls to reconsider the cross-party consensus in the UK on foreign aid and development. The main political parties are all committed to spending 0.7 percent of gross national income on aid, to using the internationally agreed definition of aid, and to maintaining a separate government department to administer the majority of this aid, led by a Cabinet Minister. In their recent report, Global Britain: A Twenty-first Century Vision, Bob Seely MP and James Rogers lay challenge to these long-established pillars of UK development policy. In this note, we consider some of the questions they raise and suggest alternative answers….”
In other UK/Brexit related news, Nature News reported UK considers post-Brexit research fund open to world.
“The UK government is considering creating an international research fund to fill a gap left by the loss of prestigious European Union funding after Brexit. Adrian Smith, director of the Alan Turing Institute in London, will lead a “major” project with the research community to look at establishing such a fund, UK science minister Chris Skidmore told a parliamentary science committee on 5 March. He said that such a fund, if established, would be open to international as well as British scientists….”
African Union Development Agency
Q&A: The African Union Development Agency takes shape
“As part of ongoing institutional reforms at the African Union, the implementing arm of its development strategy — formerly known as the New Partnership for Africa’s Development Planning and Coordinating Agency, or NEPAD — is transforming into the African Union Development Agency, or AUDA. AUDA will continue NEPAD’s overall mandate of transforming Africa through enhanced knowledge sharing, partnerships, and resource mobilization, along with promoting high-impact projects that align with the AU’s overall continental development frameworks, but will also expand on this agenda, AUDA-NEPAD CEO Ibrahim Mayaki told Devex.
“Our main focus now as a development agency will be to move to the formulation of development tools that can strengthen the capacity of all African stakeholders to better execute priority development projects,” Mayaki said. Drafted at the 2018 AU summit as part of larger institutional and financial reforms championed by then-Commissioner Paul Kagame, AUDA officially adopted its mandate and launched at the 2019 AU summit earlier this month. Mayaki said the transformation will allow the Johannesburg-based body to improve its effectiveness and efficiency in delivering AU development policies and programs across its 55 member countries. Devex spoke with Mayaki to learn more about the ongoing changes….”
Indonesia has set up an international development agency
Cfr a tweet:
“Today I learned that Indonesia has set up an international development agency the DGPDSSC, Directorate General of Public Diplomacy and South-South Collaboration (what a name! ). Glad to see even LMIC taking lead on development.”
With focus on secondary cities (“a missing area in most international development thinking and planning”), AI & digital innovation for the global public good, … acting as a catalyst to improve the health and wellbeing of children and young people in growing urban environments.
For more on this relatively new Foundation, and its focus, see Improving urban health through digital innovation (by CEO Stefan Germann)
Helen Clark Foundation set up to tackle big issues of the day
This one is completely new. “Former [New Zealand] Prime Minister Helen Clark is set to launch her own foundation for independent research into major issues of the day, including climate change and drug policy reform….”
African Heads Of State Endorse Continental Medicine Regulator
News related to the AU meeting from early February: “The African content is one step closer to its first medicine and health super-regulator. The treaty to establish an African Medicine Agency (AMA), meant to govern medical product regulation for the entire continent, was endorsed by the African Union Heads of State and Government on 11 February, according to a press release following the 32nd AU Summit in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Once the treaty is ratified by the national governments of at least 15 of the 55 African Union member states, the AMA will formally come into being as the continent’s regulatory body….”
Ebola DRC – Beyond 900… & fierce criticism of control effort by MSF
Cidrap News – Ebola total tops 900 in DRC, with 7 new cases today
Recent update of the situation. “Today the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s (DRC) ministry of health confirmed there are now officially 907 cases of Ebola in an 8-month long outbreak in the country’s North Kivu and Ituri provinces, reflecting 10 new cases in 2 days….”
See also the Telegraph – https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/slow-burn-crisis-ebola-will-take-months-resolve/
“The Ebola outbreak in Democratic Republic of Congo may not be brought under control until the end of this year, a senior UK government official has warned….”
MSF – Ebola response failing to gain the upper hand on the epidemic
“Seven months into the largest ever Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the Ebola response is failing to bring the epidemic under control in a climate of deepening community mistrust, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) said at a press conference in Geneva today.”
Excerpts of this (dire) MSF press conference (7 March):
“…The use of police and armed forces to compel people to comply with health measures against Ebola is leading to further alienation of the community and is counterproductive to controlling the epidemic. Using coercion for activities such as safe burials, tracking of contacts and admission into treatment centres discourages people from coming forward and pushes them into hiding. … … The Ebola response must take a new turn. Choices must be given back to patients and their families on how to manage the disease. Vaccination for Ebola must reach more people, and more vaccines are needed for this. Other dire health needs of communities should be addressed. And coercion must not be used as a tactic to track and treat patients, enforce safe burials or decontaminate homes. … … “Ebola is a brutal disease, bringing fear, and isolation to patients, families and health care providers,” said Dr Joanne Liu. “The Ebola response needs to become patient and community centred. Patients must be treated as patients, and not as some kind of biothreat.”
See also Stat News – Doctors Without Borders fiercely criticizes Ebola outbreak control effort
“The international president of Doctors Without Borders issued a scathing analysis on Thursday of the efforts to control the 7-month-old Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, saying the community hostility that is undermining the work is the fault of the response, not the people in the region. And Dr. Joanne Liu, who was in the affected area of DRC last week when two MSF-run Ebola treatment centers were destroyed by fire, said continuing the current approach — with ramped-up security — is unlikely to end the outbreak, which is already the second largest on record. …”
NEJM (Perspective) – An Epidemic of Suspicion — Ebola and Violence in the DRC
Must-read. Cfr tweet: “Very interesting Perspective piece in @NEJM from an @MSF team leader in the DRC #Ebola response unpacks the community resistance the response is facing in trying to halt transmission in North Kivu.”
Funding situation DRC outbreak
Cidrap – World Bank OKs funds
News from late last week.
“… The World Bank said yesterday it has approved up to $80 million in grants and credits. The World Bank support follows an urgent request from World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, PhD, earlier this week for $148 million to support the Ebola response in the DRC. … … Of the $80 million in support from the World Bank, $60 million is in grants and credits through the International Development Association, a fund for low-income countries. Also, a $20 million grant was approved by the Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility (PEF), specialty bonds that were launched in 2017 to streamline surge funding to developing countries facing pandemic threats. The financing tool was created by the World Bank along with Japan, Germany, and Australia. According to the World Bank statement, the group approved the PEF grant within 3 days of receiving a request from the DRC government. Half will be released immediately to fund the frontline response, with the rest released within a month or sooner, as needed. The first PEF funds were tapped in May 2018 during the DRC’s previous Ebola outbreak in Equateur province. …”
This week, the Wellcome Trust also announced new support – “Wellcome is making £2 million available to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the government of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), to support vaccine research as part of the emergency response to the Ebola outbreak there. “
NYT on traditional healers & Ebola outbreak
“On a continent wracked with epidemics, millions turn to traditional healers. In rural Uganda, not far from the Ebola zone, an herbalist describes his practice.”
“Across the African continent, according to the World Health Organization, there are about 80 times as many traditional healers as there are medical doctors. Millions of Africans consult healers but, studies suggest, usually do not admit it if they see doctors, too. … … In Congo, doctors now fighting Ebola believe that many of their patients first get infected while visiting such healers. They may arrive at the home of someone like Mr. Muriisa with malaria, or even a cough or other minor problem, but then end up lying next to someone with undiagnosed Ebola. … … In the 2014 West African outbreak, which infected more than 11,000 people, the death of a prominent healer was a crucial “super-spreader event,” linked to over 300 cases. That healer, who lived in rural Sierra Leone, died after catching the virus from one of her patients. Hundreds of relatives and admirers came from many miles away for her funeral and helped wash her body, which was presumably teeming with virus….”
Check out also the related NYT Insider piece – What Our Reporter Has Learned From Traditional African Healers (Donald McNeill Jr)
“… The term “witch doctor” is pejorative, but it captures something that “traditional healer” conceals. There are actually two schools of African medicine: those who rely on herbs and those who remove spells. Or who, if they have evil hearts, will cast them for money. … … Western doctors working in Africa need to understand how differently their patients view disease. …” And they should treat them with respect instead of disdain, asking to work together and teaching them good (safe) practices, if possible.
NEJM – A Longitudinal Study of Ebola Sequelae in Liberia
It looks as if Ebola can persist way longer in semen than thought. Check out this new study.
The authors also recommend that WHO’s recommendation (WHO currently says that a person can be considered Ebola-free if semen is tested every three months until two consecutive tests are negative) is reevaluated.
And a quick link:
Economist – Leader: the new scramble for Africa
“This time, the winners could be Africans themselves.”
After the first (colonialism) & second scramble (Cold War) for Africa, “… A third surge, now under way, is more benign. Outsiders have noticed that the continent is important and becoming more so, not least because of its growing share of the global population (by 2025 the un predicts that there will be more Africans than Chinese people). Governments and businesses from all around the world are rushing to strengthen diplomatic, strategic and commercial ties. This creates vast opportunities. If Africa handles the new scramble wisely, the main winners will be Africans themselves.
“The extent of foreign engagement is unprecedented (see Briefing: a sub-Saharan seduction ). …”
So there are more choices than ever for African leaders. But this also has (potential) disadvantages. The Economist has four pieces of advice for Africans (and their leaders) to make the most of the new ‘scramble for Africa’.
Children with disabilities – Most Left Behind?
UN News – 93 million children with disabilities ‘among the most likely to be left behind’: UN rights chief
“States should do more for an estimated 93 million children with disabilities who are “among the most likely to be left behind and the least likely to be heard”, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Michelle Bachelet, said on Monday.”
Largest ever HIV prevention trial
LSHTM – ‘Test and Treat’ reduces new HIV infections by a third in southern Africa communities
“Results from largest ever HIV prevention trial suggest strategy could make a significant contribution to controlling epidemic.”
“New HIV infections in southern Africa could be reduced substantially by offering entire communities voluntary HIV testing, and immediately referring those who test positive for HIV treatment in line with local guidelines, according to new research presented at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) in Seattle, USA. The HPTN071 (PopART) trial found that new HIV infections were 30% lower in communities where this intervention was introduced alongside offering other proven HIV prevention measures to those who tested negative, compared to communities that received standard care. The randomised study involving around one million people in Zambia and South Africa was led by researchers at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and Imperial College London. The study found that a similar decline in new HIV infections was not seen in communities where those who tested positive were offered immediate treatment from the beginning of the study. Analyses are under way to explain this puzzling outcome. …”
USAID welcomed the results.
Blueprint for a Market-Driven Value-Based Advance Commitment (MVAC) for Tuberculosis (consultation draft)
CGD – The World Needs Better Drugs for TB. We Have a Proposal—and We Need your Feedback
“… Recent policy announcements by MIC (Middle-Income Countries) governments, however, suggest they are eager to engage with global health initiatives, including the TB R&D agenda. This opens a window of opportunity for establishing a new partnership model whilst also setting up Health Technology Assessment institutions for assessing the value for money for the healthcare spend in these countries. Over the past year, the Center for Global Development and the Office of Health Economics have been building out a new innovation model to seize this opportunity and bring better TB drugs to market. We call it the “Market-Driven, Value-Based Advance Commitment,” or MVAC for short … … The MVAC builds on the Advance Market Commitment (AMC) model previously used in global health, but with several important improvements. Most importantly, the MVAC is driven by MIC demand rather than donor contributions; informed by countries’ own willingness to pay rather than a single, “cost-plus” price; and allows pharmaceutical companies to reap higher revenues from a more effective product. The MVAC model is intended to serve as a bridge between the dysfunctional status quo and a more sustainable and effective R&D ecosystem—one which more closely emulates the positive characteristics of HIC markets for healthcare products and opens up potential markets to MICs’ home-grown innovative industry.
The MVAC blueprint is a work in progress, but today we’re pleased to share a preliminary draft. … “
You find the preliminary blueprint here.
Nature – China to tighten rules on gene editing in humans
“In the wake of the gene-edited-baby scandal, scientists and institutions could face tough penalties for breaking the rules.”
Stat News – China creating national medical ethics committee to oversee high-risk clinical trials
(gated) “A powerful new national medical ethics committee, which will approve all clinical trials involving high-risk biomedical technologies, is at the center of a regulatory shakeup Chinese authorities are planning in the aftermath of the widely condemned “CRISPR babies” experiment, STAT has learned. The technologies that will be regulated by the ethics committee are often new and are deemed risky either because of safety or moral concerns. They will include not only gene editing, but also cloning, cell therapy, xenotransplantation, mitochondrial replacement, and nanotechnology.”
For the (likely) background of all this new Chinese government regulation, see Vox – CRISPR babies: the Chinese government may have known more than it let on. …
Some papers & journal articles of the week
Plos Med – Health system performance for people with diabetes in 28 low- and middle-income countries: A cross-sectional study of nationally representative surveys
“Using individual participant data from a large cohort study, Jennifer Manne-Goehler & colleagues reveal poor healthcare provision for diabetes patients in 28 LMICs.”
SS&M – Armed conflict and maternal health care utilization: Evidence from the Boko Haram Insurgency in Nigeria
Highlights: « The Boko Haram Insurgency (BHI) reduced maternal health care use in Nigeria. The adverse effects of the BHI on access extended beyond the Northeastern region. The effects of BHI on access were larger closer to the location of attacks. »
Special issue Global Public Health – Analysing power and politics in health policies and systems; Guest Editors: Radhika Gore and Richard Parker
Check out the Editorial first – Analysing power and politics in health policies and systems. Most papers were already published before, online.
Global Policy – An Assessment of Grant‐based Multilateral Funding Flows from 2014 to 2016
J McArthur et al; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.12653
“This paper presents a global snapshot of how all countries, plus the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, allocated approximately $63 billion per year across 54 major multilateral organizations during the 2014–16 period. We assess direct funding to United Nations and non‐UN organizations to examine three key questions. First, how much does each funder contribute to each organization? Second, what is the relative importance of each funder to each organization? Third, how do funding allocations compare to objective benchmarks like share of donor country income, share of world income and share of world population? We find that a small number of countries provide a majority of total funding and a small number of organizations account for a majority of total resources received. Only a handful of countries are the top funders to at least one organization, but a variety of mid‐ and smaller‐sized economies play larger relative roles in some smaller organizations. Estimating funders’ flows across organizations allows for assessment of their revealed preferences among multilateral priorities and enables comparison against objective benchmarks for burden‐sharing. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide a comprehensive mapping of all countries’ recent annual grant funding across the majority of large multilateral institutions.”
Blogs & mainstream articles of the week
Devex – Opinion: 7 issues gaining momentum in global health
Focus on the NCD conversation & trends here. “…As global attention to public health issues continues to gain momentum in 2019, here are seven issues and trends that will be critical to shaping the conversation on NCDs:…” (1) Air pollution will be addressed as a driver of NCDs and climate action; (2) Taxes on unhealthy commodities will be key to financing NCD control; (3) Calls for urgent action to improve food and nutrition will be front and center; (4) Cities will continue to be laboratories for NCD prevention strategies; (5) Momentum for alcohol control will grow; (6) Access to medicine will remain contentious; (7) Debate on reducing commercial influence on health policies will heat up.
OECD Development matters – Are gender norms the new magic bullet in development?
By C Harper (ODI).
“The terms gender and social norms have become increasingly used in development discourse. They focus on the core of discrimination: people’s attitudes and behaviours as held and enacted by individuals, as housed in social institutions, and as codified in formal and informal laws. These attitudes and behaviours push women and girls to the margin of society, leaving them disempowered and often impoverished. But changes in these social and cultural rules are not simply cosmetic; social norms are being actively contested and changed, and these changes have the potential to endure and make a real difference. However, changing norms, or the rules underpinning discriminatory attitudes and behaviours in our daily lives, can face difficulties on multiple fronts. For one, norm change can look dangerously like a magic bullet for fixing social problems. As work on norm change grows in popularity in the development sector, these efforts risk overlooking the complexity of what works to change norms and the multi-level nature of change that is required. At the same time, others see norm change as too challenging. Efforts to change norms can be difficult, highly political and risk provoking backlash. So is it worth trying to address norms? And if so what action is required? …”
IHP (blog) – Engaging citizens for evidence-informed health policies in Lebanon
Olivia Biermann (EV 2018), Rana Saleh et al; http://www.internationalhealthpolicies.org/engaging-citizens-for-evidence-informed-health-policies-in-lebanon/
“In evidence-informed policy-making, there has been an increasing focus on involving those who are potentially affected by policies in the policy-making process. While at the Knowledge to Policy Center (K2P) (American University of Beirut, Lebanon), I spoke to Rana Saleh (Advocacy and Evidence Lead Specialist at K2P) on her work on citizen engagement. She provided me with insights into why citizen engagement is important for health policy, what could be learned about the topic from the literature, and how K2P made citizen engagement a reality in Lebanon.”
CGD (blog) – Exaggerating Multinational Tax Avoidance Does Not Help Africa
“Matti Kohonen of Christian Aid holds out the enticing prospect that African countries could collect an additional 1.5 percent of gross domestic product in tax if only big multinationals would stop dodging. The problem is that this estimate is (still) based on wishful thinking. Multinational corporations should pay tax, but the scale of potential revenues depend on underlying levels of investment and profitability in a country….”
Forstater argues we shouldn’t exaggerate (the size of) multinational tax avoidance (in Africa), and concludes:
“…The absolute value of revenue losses for low-income countries from multinational corporate profit shifting is likely to be much smaller than popular perception. For example, Tørsløv, Wier and Zucman’s calculations for India put the gross surplus of all foreign firms at around $15 per capita, suggesting tax revenues at stake are a couple of dollars per person per year. Mick Keen highlights that the experience of efforts to enhance domestic resource mobilisation suggests we should be distrustful of fads. “The fundamental strengthening of revenue collection will be largely a matter of persistent and unspectacular effort.” Promoting spectacular hopes for gains from international action on multinational corporations risks undermines the persistent and unspectacular effort of policymakers and tax authorities (and of international action to assist them), as well as undermining the morale of citizens to pay tax.”
Oxfam (report) – Off the Hook: Notorious tax havens to be let off the hook in EU’s blacklist review
“European finance ministers look set to give nine of the world’s worst tax havens a clean bill of health when they publish their first annual review of the EU tax haven blacklist at a meeting in Brussels next week. New analysis by Oxfam reveals that the Bahamas, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Hong Kong, the Isle of Man, Jersey and Panama are likely to be de-listed entirely by the EU. Some of them were at the centre of recent tax scandals highlighted by the Paradise Papers and Panama Papers….”
Meanwhile, Euractiv reported Member states reject Commission’s blacklist of money launderers. “EU member states rejected on Thursday (7 March) the European Commission’s blacklist of countries unwilling to cooperate in the fight against money laundering and terrorism financing, as they blamed the EU executive of not being transparent during the drafting process.” #ahum
Duncan Green (blog) – What are the consequences of the shift from a two hump to a one hump world?
Must-read. On the three consequences of the shift to a one-hump world.
Duncan explains his idea: “… It uses a simple pair of graphs on global income distribution to start thinking through how the ‘aid and development’ sector is changing, or resisting change. The starting point is that we have moved from a two hump to a one hump world…” In, say, 1974 we lived in a two hump world (North & South), now we live in a one hump world.
“North-South is no longer a particularly useful view of the world, (with the partial exception of sub-Saharan Africa). That’s the point brilliantly made by Hans Rosling. But what else follows from the shift? I see three trends, each of which is being resisted by the status quo ante…. “
They are: Inequality; the localization of politics; a shift to common challenges.
Jason Hickel (blog) – How bad is global inequality, really?
Hickel reinterprets Branko Milanovic’s famous elephant graph (by rendering it in absolute terms, not relative gains): “It’s not an elephant graph anymore. It’s a boomerang.”
Brookings ‘Future Development’ (blog) – Closing Africa’s health financing gap
This blog features insights from the recent Stories from Africa seminar series at Duke University. Well worth a read.
“…We think that progress towards achieving the SDGs for health can still be made in Africa with the adoption of four straightforward—i.e., simple, not easy—steps to encourage efficiency….”
You might also want to read another Brookings blog – Is trade with India changing Africa’s health care landscape?
Bloomberg – Smaller Countries Are Becoming the Healthiest
“Rankings of global health, wealth and happiness are increasingly placing big countries with booming economies at the back of the line….”
Guardian – Revealed: populist leaders linked to reduced inequality
“Populists on left and right have closed gap between rich and poor – but also eroded freedoms.”
“Populist presidents and prime ministers are associated with significant reductions in economic inequality across the world, according to groundbreaking research that will challenge the assumption that populism only has negative consequences. However, the research by political scientists and economists also found that governments run by populist leaders are correlated with declines in the quality of elections, a loosening of constraints on executive power, and a sometimes dramatic fall in press freedom….”